What this does
AI import creates a draft journey from one source you already trust. Custory can draft:- a journey name
- likely stages
- likely steps
- initial structure your team can review
Choose AI import when the source is already clear
AI import is usually the best starting point when one source already explains the journey better than a blank journey would. Good fits:- a public setup or onboarding flow on your website or docs
- one GitHub repository that reflects the product area you want to map
- one focused Notion page or database
- one Figma file that shows the flow clearly
Current starting paths
Custory currently supports these journey-creation paths from the dashboard:- From website or URL
- From GitHub, when GitHub is connected
- From Notion, when Notion is connected
- From Figma, when Figma is available and connected in your workspace
Pick the source that tells the truest story
The best import is usually the narrowest source that already describes one real customer journey. Prefer:- one repo over a broad monorepo
- one specific docs page over a generic homepage
- one focused Notion page over a mixed workspace
- one relevant Figma file over a large design library
Add journey context before you run it
Custory lets you describe what the journey should cover before the import runs. Use that field. Good examples:Onboarding journey for new self-serve usersTrial-to-paid flow for first-time workspace ownersActivation journey for teams connecting Slack and inviting their first teammate
customer journey or main flow leave too much room for the importer to guess wrong.
Which import path to use
Website or URL
Use a URL import when the public product story already explains the journey well. This works best for:- self-serve signup flows
- pricing and plan-comparison paths
- onboarding or setup docs
- public help content that describes activation clearly
GitHub
Use GitHub import when the most useful source is the product itself. This works best when:- the product already exists
- one repository maps closely to the customer flow
- engineering reality should shape the first draft
- Connect the GitHub integration.
- Select the repository you want to use.
- Add a short note describing the journey scope.
Notion
Use Notion import when the clearest source is already documented. Good examples:- research notes
- discovery summaries
- workshop writeups
- onboarding documentation
Figma
Use Figma import when the structure of the experience is easiest to understand from the design itself. This is useful for:- early-stage products that are still design-heavy
- new flows that are not fully shipped yet
- redesign work where the screens explain the journey better than the current implementation
What to do right after the import
Do not treat the draft as ready for the rest of the team. Do this first:- Rename anything vague.
- Remove stages that do not belong.
- Rewrite steps from the customer’s point of view.
- Add or correct the first items.
- Link the right persona if one matters.
Add screenshot of the AI import flow and first imported draft here
Example
Say your team wants to map trial-to-paid onboarding. You already have:- a pricing page
- a help article for setup
- one repo for the onboarding flow
Import mistakes to avoid
Importing from the broadest source you have
Importing from the broadest source you have
A focused source usually gives you a better draft than a source that mixes several journeys together.
Skipping the journey-context prompt
Skipping the journey-context prompt
One sentence about the scope often saves a lot of cleanup later.
Treating the draft as validated truth
Treating the draft as validated truth
Review the stages, step names, and assumptions before the team starts using the journey.
Leaving the draft disconnected from evidence
Leaving the draft disconnected from evidence
Add items soon after the import so the map becomes useful for real decisions, not just structure review.